Search for contacts, projects,
courses and publications

Argumentation in the Media

Description

Course Objectives

  • Develop a critical awareness of the quality and effectiveness of arguments.
  • Learn how to argue in written form by criticizing arguments and responding to criticism.
  • Experience arguing in real time by participating in a debate simulation.
  • Understand public arguments in the current networked media ecology and the threats to their freedom, responsibility, plausibility and relevance.
  • Reflect on journalistic question design and its role in ensuring the argumentative quality of public accountability processes.
  • Reflect on argumentation in the newsroom as a resource for newsmaking decisions.

Course Description

Argumentation is a discursive activity aimed at solving differences of opinion by presenting reasons. In an ideal argumentative context issues are solved reasonably, relying on “the unforced force of the better argument” (Habermas). The ability to craft effective and sound arguments and to critically assess arguments as they appear in the current media ecology are critical skills for media professionals. Moreover, argumentation represents a resource for sound decision making within media organizations. Finally, media managers need to understand the factors impacting the quality of argumentation as they act as gatekeepers and platform providers for discussions in the public sphere.

  • Having introduced the basics of argument analysis, the course dwells on the requirements of a critical discussion, discussing with current examples the threats to the freedom of discussions (ad hominem, ad baculum, free speech vs. hate speech),to their responsibility (presumptions and burden of proof), to acceptability of evidence (sourcing, misinformation and “fake news”, conspiracies and debunking), to the relevance of arguments (“straw man” fallacy, undue polarization).
  • Political press conferences are then explored in-depth to practice the analytical reconstruction of arguments from a dialectical and inferential viewpoint, with a focus on journalist’s critical questions, the role of implicit premises and the form of reasoning (argument scheme). At the same time, the work on press conferences will allow to appreciate the role of media argumentation in public accountability processes.
  • Thanks to a series of case studies of argumentation in the newsroom based on authentic recordings, the course then explores decision making of journalists in newsroom meetings, their writing processes, and the argumentative design of the final news products.

Learning Methods

 Apart from attending to traditional lectures, during the course the students will be asked to (1) write short argumentative opinion pieces and criticize the work of their peers, (2) analyze in-depth (with the help of an online argument visualization tool) the argumentative functioning of questions and answers in a political press conference, (3) to prepare and to participate in a debate simulation on an assigned topic of public interest.

Attendance

The attendance to the lectures is not mandatory. However, during the course, the students are requested to consistently participate in the above mentioned in-course activities (1, 2 and 3) and submit in-course work in a timely manner.

Examination Information

In-course activities (1, 2, 3) will amount to 30% of the grade. The score will reflect both the level of participation and the quality of the output.

A final oral exam will assign the remaining 70% of the grade. The oral exam will consist of two components: A) a presentation of an analysis of question-answer argumentation in a political press conference (expanding the work done in-course, cf. 2) and B) an interview on the theories and cases discussed in the course. The two components have equal weight.

Required Material

Students will read select passages from the following texts:

  • Zampa, M. (2017). Argumentation in the Newsroom. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins.
  • Eemeren, F. H. van. (2018). Argumentation Theory: A Pragma- Dialectical Perspective. Cham: Springer.
  • Rigotti, E., & Greco, S. (2019). Inference in Argumentation: A topics-based approach to argument schemes. Cham: Springer.

Additionally, they will familiarize with the OVA platform for argument analysis http://ova.arg-tech.org/

While not required, the following book is highly recommended:

  • Paglieri, F. (2020). La disinformazione felice. Cosa ci insegnano le bufale. Bologna: il Mulino

People

 

Rocci A.

Course director

Raimondo C.

Assistant

Additional information

Semester
Spring
Academic year
2020-2021
ECTS
6
Language
English
Education
Master of Arts in Philosophy, Elective course, Elective Courses, 1st year

Master of Arts in Philosophy, Elective course, Elective Courses, 2nd year

Master of Science in Communication in Media Management, Core course, Core Course, 1st year