Should clinical ethicists be informed about case resolutions?
Additional information
Authors
Type
Journal Article
Year
2025
Language
English
Abstract
The question of whether clinical ethicists should be informed of case resolutions remains unresolved. While the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH) recommends retrospective case reviews to assess whether recommendations were followed, it frames this practice solely as a quality improvement measure. While quality enhancement is a compelling rationale for ensuring that clinical ethicists are informed of the resolutions of consultations, it is not the sole justification for such transparency. Access to case resolutions strengthens ethics education, enhances accountability and transparency, facilitates contributions to the field and advocacy, and mitigates the emotional uncertainty that can arise when ethicists lack closure on complex cases. Although concerns about confidentiality and administrative constraints must be considered, they should not hinder efforts to foster a more transparent consultation process.
Keywords
Clinical ethics, Institutional ethics committees, Clinical ethicist, Case resolutions
Journal
HEC Forum
Pages (or article number)
1-2
Diffusion
License
CC BY
Visibility
Public
Status open access
Hybrid
